Category Archives: Democracy

The boot of authoritarianism: if they thought for one minute they could get away with it

Dereck Chauvin put his knee on the neck of George Floyd, stared into the camera and dared us to do anything about it.     

         Donald Trump did exactly what Chauvin did – he put his knee on the neck of democracy, decency, legality. He stared into the camera and dared us to do anything about it.

         Putin has done exactly what Chauvin did – he has put his knee on the neck of Navalny, stared into the camera and dared us to do anything about it.

         These are lessons, authoritarian lessons.  They are demonstrating to us that that they can do whatever they want.  They can even murder one of us right in front of our very eyes and we can’t do a damn thing about it.

         We have won tonight, in the Chauvin case.  We have won because of the mobilization of millions of people putting pressure on the system to live up to its ideals.  We have won because of the courage and discipline of a group of witnesses.  We have won and we can win again.

         We must stand together and stand up to the boot of authoritarian rule on our necks.  We stopped them with the Chauvin verdict.  That’s why the legal system avoids jury trials if at all possible, especially for powerful defendants.  We can, and we must stop them again.  We must demand that the participants in the corrupt crime spree that was the Trump administration are held to account.  We must demand that dangerous men like Putin and the oligarchs that surround him are held to account.

         If we do not see, truly see that these actions are preparations for authoritarianism, they will come back for us. They are obviously not phased in the least by the electoral defeat in 2020.  The tidal wave of voter suppression being orchestrated by the Republicans is just another way to take power because they cannot win it legitimately. It is their way back in power.  We must take them seriously or we will find ourselves in 2022 and 2024 with another authoritarian take-over of the governmental process. If we flirt with that possibility, we may never recover.

         That look you saw on Chavin’s face when he was kneeling there, crushing the life out of a man, is the same look you would see on the face of Bill Barr, Donald Trump, Jared Kushner, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, Pompeo, Pence, Steven Miller, Manafort and many others while they crushed the life out of anyone who opposed them if they thought for one minute they could get away with it.   If we let them get away with it, they will crush the life out of democracy and our lives will be unalterably changed.  If we don’t take them seriously, if we don’t fight them we will find ourselves living under that knee being given the same compassion and respect Dereck Chavin gave George Floyd. 

A breath of fresh air, a democrat tells the truth about christopher wray, fbi

Blog: Christopher Wray

For reasons inexplicable to me, the corporate media has always tried to make a hero out of Christopher Wray.  Most of the Democratic establishment has refused to criticize him and Biden has decided to allow him to remain as FBI Director.

But, in a giant departure from the way Wray is talked about by the corporate news media and the Democratic party, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse from Rhode Island, last night on MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, told the truth.  It was a breath of fresh air. Democrats ought to try it more often.

Whitehouse told Hayes that in Wray’s testimony before the Senate, he was “less clear” than Merrick Garland that the Justice Department would follow the investigation of the January 6, insurrection wherever it may lead. 

Whitehouse was particularly concerned that the investigation would be dumped on the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.  Were this to happen, Whitehouse argued, there would be real questions of whether the investigation would go further than low level participants to “upstream investigations” of people who were actually driving the crime.  Whitehouse seemed to feel confident that Garland would pursue these “upstream” investigations.

When asked directly by Hayes if he thought Wray was a “straight shooter,” Whitehouse issued a scoffing laugh.  “If so, that would be a new phenomenon.” 

“I’ve spent three years trying to get him to answer questions and he has hidden behind every conceivable dodge” continued Whitehouse.  “We have unanswered questions from 2017.”

According to Whitehouse, in hearing after hearing during the Trump administration, Wray failed to answer questions not only submitted by Democrats, but those submitted by Republicans.  In seven of nine hearings Wray participated in, the committee got no answers. 

“He (Wray) participated in or ran a massive traffic jam that stopped answers to huge numbers of QFRs (questions for the record)…and to all of our letters.  At the same time, he set up this side road where they could run” lots of documents into the Republicans to do the Cross Fire Hurricane investigation. 

Whitehouse said he still wanted to know why questions got “jammed into the traffic jam” while “Trump friendly” questions got high speed treatment.  He wanted to know “why were we stonewalled all those years…what was the method, on whose instruction was that done, what was the scheme, what was the plan, why did it happen, all that.” 

And Whitehouse, quite rightly, pointed out that the FBI under Wray engaged in an absurd exercise characterized as an “investigation” of the charges against Brett Kavanaugh. 

Whitehouse said it was necessary to go back to “the FBI investigation of Bret Kavanaugh and whether that was real or fake and what happened with that so called tip line FBI ran, because as best as I can tell…all the information (from the tip line)…got dumped straight into the bin.”  None of it got reviewed “pursuant to standard FBI procedures for reviewing the information that comes in through a tip line.  It was more a tip dump than a tip line.  And understanding if that happened, why that happened on whose direction, presumably from the White House.”

Whitehouse concluded: “If this guy (Wray) presided over a fake FBI investigation, we need to know that.”

I would like to point out that Sen. Chris Coons, Democrat, helped set up that FBI investigation.  He and Christopher Wray need to be held to account. 

DEMOCRACY OR AUTHORITARIANISM, YOU CHOOSE

147 Republican members of Congress voted against seating Joe Biden’s electors.  They moved against accepting the votes of the people in this country based on no evidence that there was a significant problem with the voting system. 

These 147 Republican members of Congress did not win, but they tried to.  There are not 147 Trumps.  These people are Republicans.  They are Republicans who do not support democracy.  But, as of today, they are all still in Congress.

Just like all the other outrages of the Trump administration, the fact that 147 members of Congress tried to throw out the results of an election, is being normalized.  Corporate news anchors are repeatedly asking representatives of the Biden administration how they can claim to seek “unity” when they are proposing legislation that differs from (what purports to be) the Republican agenda. 

The past four years has been difficult, nerve wracking, infuriating, but since the nomination of Biden, it has been even more infuriating.  It is perhaps a bit less stressful since I don’t wake up every morning dreading to find out what the president has done while I was asleep, but the Democrats and the corporate media seen to have learned nothing, NOTHING from the last four years.

The Democrats have not learned how to run against the Republicans, and the corporate media (in the face of an insurrection) is still indulging in mindless bothsidesism.

When Trump was in office, it seemed like a frontal assault, every day.  Now, I have the feeling that the corporate media is playing music while people are relentlessly creeping up behind me. 

Unlike many of the people I know, I feel no relief with the election of Biden.  The Democrats are still talking about “unity” and “bipartisanship” with people who have demonstrated that they want to destroy democracy to maintain their power.  It’s like watching a government negotiate, trying to win over the Naxi party.  It is enraging and it is terrifying.

While the Democrats waltz around congratulating each other for representational appointments, the Republicans are seizing 2022.

In Georgia, Warnock is up for reelection in 2022.  We don’t have six years with Warnock, we have less than two.  We have to do this again.  We have to drag out a win in what is essentially a red state, and we have to do it in a circumstance where the state government is already actively working to eliminate as many potential voters as possible.

In Georgia, Republicans have proposed steps to make it harder to vote by mail and easier to throw out legally cast ballots.  The same Republicans who the corporate media celebrated – Kemp, Raffensperger, Sterling – are beavering away to purge voters from the rolls and make it more difficult for people to vote.

What people need to remember is that Kemp, Raffensperger and Sterling went along with every Trump inspired move to suppress voting except put themselves in criminal jeopardy by changing votes.  They are like the gang members who were perfectly willing to drive the get away car, but not willing to go into the liquor store with the gun.

They will be even more willing to drive the car now because they are trying to get back into the good graces, and the donations, of right-wing supporters.

Across the Country

Emily Singer (1/22/21) is reporting in the Independent that efforts to make it harder to vote are going on in most of the GOP-controlled state legislatures.  They are introducing legislation to make voter registration and voting by mail more difficult.

These voter suppression moves have been practiced by the Republicans for decades, but picked up steam especially after Biden’s win in 2020.  Republicans are daily pointing out the dangers of what they see as “voter fraud” and legitimating moves to keep people from voting in the name of eliminating “voter fraud.”

In Montana, the state House began hearings on a bill which would eliminate same-day voter registration.  This is what the SOS refers to as “election integrity.”  These measures are expected and intended to affect the voting of Native Americans and students.  Both groups vote Democratic by a wide margin.

In New Hampshire, the GOP-controlled House started hearings on a bill that would repeal same-day registration and putt barriers to students who want to vote.  Students must, if the bill is passed, prove that they qualify for in-state tuition before registering to vote.  Republicans passed a similar law ahead of the 2020 election which required students to become permanent residents to vote.  This law was struck down by a judge.

In Arizona, a GOP-run legislature is weighing getting rid of the state’s Permanent Early Vote List, which allows residents to register to receive mail-in ballots automatically. They are also working to impose restrictions on recounts and add other burdens to discourage people from voting.

In Pennsylvania, a Republican state senator introduced a bill that would eliminate no-excuse absentee voting. 

In Mississippi, a Republican state senator proposed a bill which would lock Mississippi from releasing vote totals in presidential elections until after all states had cast their votes in the Electoral College. 

Democrats in the House are working to pass H.R.1, which would require states to implement automatic voter registration and limit their ability to purge voters from the rolls.  An identical bill passed the House in 2019, but McConnell blocked it from getting a vote. 

So, Democrats are trying to make it easier for people to vote.  Republicans, who realize they cannot win if there is a popular vote, are working furiously to purge voting lists and make it more difficult for people to vote. 

One Party is advocating and working for democracy. The other party is fighting against it.  You choose.

Resources

https://americanindependent.com/gop-lawmakers-states-legislation-voter-suppression/

it ain’t over by a long shot, chris hayes, voter suppression and arizona

147 Republican members of Congress voted against seating Joe Biden’s electors.  They voted against accepting the votes of the people based on no evidence that there was a significant problem with the voting system.  These members didn’t win, but that’s how they voted.  There are not 147 Trumps.  These people are Republicans who do not believe in democracy. 

What they were saying was, the people of this country can have an election, but after that election Congress will decide whether they accept what the American people have decided.  As Chris Hayes stated it: You can vote, but if you vote for the wrong person, we will decide.

In Arizona, a member of Congress has introduced a bill giving the legislature the explicit power to override the Secretary of State’s certification of electoral votes.  This bill has a reasonable change of passage.  Again, what this means is that people can vote (as in other countries like Russia) but the vote is meaningless.  A small group of elites decide who will run the country.

As Rep. Ruben Gallego noted on Chris Hayes’ show (1/29/21) the Republican party reacted to losing a presidential election by trying to further restrict who votes (voter suppression) and trying to find means of overthrowing elections they lose.

These people are working, every day, every minute.  They are not going away, and they are going to come back in 2022 stronger than ever.  If anyone has any doubt about this, just watch Fox News or Newsmax for 10 minutes. 

This is no time for waltzing off into the sunset in a delusion of representational politics.  It ain’t over, not by a long shot. 

Putting the pieces together: reality winner

PUTTING TOGETHER THE PIECES: Reality Winner

In June 2018, Reality Winner pleaded guilty in a plea agreement that resulted in the longest-ever sentence imposed for a leak of national security information to the media.   

As her mother wrote:

Although Reality’s legal team did their best to build a defense for her, the court ruled against them at every turn, and the threat of 10 years in prison and hefty fines if she didn’t prevail at trial became too much to battle against.

Despite having a spotless record, distinguished military service, documented volunteerism, and service to her community, the government’s sentencing memo…portrayed Reality as an enemy of the country.

On August 23, 2018, the court sentenced Reality to 63 months in prison and three years of supervised release.

In a press release, U.S. Attorney Bobby Christine stated that resolving the case with this plea agreement was the best resolution, as a trial…[might] risk the further disclosure of classified information.

He said that the sentence imposed on Reality “promotes respect for the law and affords deterrence to similar criminal conduct in the future” — using Reality as the example. He referred to her as a “quintessential example of an insider threat.”

After releasing a press statement bragging about the length of the sentence, Christine continued to preside over her persecution.  He fought her move for Compassionate Release. 

Sources:

•        https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/atlanta-us-attorney-brings-in-assistants-who-worked-on-voter-fraud-issues-raising-fears-of-political-interference/2021/01/08/c4057f9a-51c9-11eb-83e3-322644d82356_story.html

Twitter: cjjohns1951

Glenn greenwald interviewed by chris hedges: monday notes

I don’t pretend to fully understand the ideology of Chris Hedges or Glenn Greenwall, and there are important positions I disagree with them on.  But, I think they are important to at least listen to given the lack of criticism on the part of the corporate media for the Biden Administration.  CNN is doing a “celebrity piece” on Kamala Harris where she is asked to tell stories from her life. 

The media is supposed to be a critic of those in power, not their best friends.     

These are notes from an interview Chris Hedges did on his RT program “On Contact.”

Points made by Greenwald:

•       Bernie Sanders was rebuffed in his attempt to get the Secretary of Labor position in the Biden administration.  Sanders has expressed frustration with the Biden appointments.

•       AOC was denied a position on the Commerce Committee.

•       (Note: The DNC also refused to give Katie Porter a waiver to stay on another important committee)

•       What the Biden nominations represent is a third term of the Obama administration.

•       Susan Rice was nominated for the Domestic Policy Council

•       Biden has a long completely obvious history.  He has supported militarism.  He was a key supporter of the Invasion of Iraq, 2002, as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee

•       Biden’s state is the center of Banking and credit card industry.  He was so supportive of them that it provoked Sen. Warren to get into politics.  Biden was the architect of a bankruptcy bill that made Warren furious.

•       Biden, in addition, was more responsible for the crime bill than anybody else.

•       Biden has shown himself to be a man who serves imperialism and corporatism.

•       Wall Street celebrated when he picked Harris as Vice President. 

•       (Greenwald lives in Brazil.)  People ask him why Brazil suddenly lurched to right.  He explains that after years of what billed itself as being a “liberal” system, the system failed people.  They rallied behind anybody who seemed to oppose the system that failed them.  That’s what has happened with Trump. 

•       Now, the Biden administration is going to do exactly what the Obama administration did, nothing, for regular people.  And so, if you are doing exactly the same thing, you have to expect the same outcome.  The Obama failures led to the Trump administration.  And, now the Biden administration is setting itself up to repeat Obama’s failures. (Note: See Majority Report discussion noting that the Biden Administration seems to have learned from the failures of the Obama administration.)  According to Greenwald, the Middle class will continue to be destroyed.  Jobs will continue to be moved overseas.  The drug addiction, suicide, and anger that characterize working class communities will all continue to get worse.    

•       Note: There were such enormous hopes for Obama.  My brother, noting the support enjoyed by Obama, said “He could be the next Roosevelt.”  But, Obama wasn’t the next Roosevelt.  Obama was constitutionally predisposed to behave himself in many senses of that.  No matter what happened, Obama was going to behave himself.  Research the discussion about “behaving” and race.  Also, the Obama administration assumed that the Republicans were operating from a position of good faith, (what ever that means).  The Republicans are definitely not operating from a position of “good faith” and have not done so for decades.  How long it will take the Democrats to acknowledge this, I don’t know.  And, Obama was never a progressive, never a supporter of real change.  The movement that helped Obama get elected was jettisoned immediately after the election in 2008.  The group organizing for him were told to “behave.’  People were told not to give money to these groups, but to give the money to support Obama.  These groups, by and large, went silent under Obama. 

Christ Hedges: Biden and Obama regard progressives as the enemy.

•       Biden has always had contempt for the left.  As has Obama. 

•       And, the left is now more submissive than ever.  They are even praising Biden for distancing himself from Bernie, saying it was a savvy political move.  They played along with the excuse was that it was better to leave Barnie in the Senate than appointment his labor secretary. 

•       There are no progressives in the cabinet.

•       And, even with this fact, there is little dissent on the left. 

•       The choice that is presented is you can either unite behind the Democratic Party or succumb to fascism. 

•       The left has embraced censorship coming from corporations, and Biden is calling for new terrorism law.  Biden was an architect of the Patriot Act.

•       Hedges brings up the Hunter Biden laptop story which, he says, was censored out of the Intercept (the organization Greenwald co-founded).

•       Hedges points out that progressives supported Markey in Massachusetts against a primary challenge from Joe Kennedy.  After Markey won, he participated in a hearing with Zuckerberg.  Markey told Zuckerberg: we don’t believe you are censoring too much, you’re not censoring enough.   

•       Obama released a statement before election in which he said that the internet was the greatest threat to democracy.

•       The political center has decided we cannot have free speech in this technological age.  The center was pleading with billionaires to censor people even before the election.

•       World leaders denounced the banning of Trump from the internet (Merkle, Obredor of Mexico).

•       These leaders are well aware that tech corporations can do this to them (censor them) and their countries.   The EU has tried to break up these big Silicon valley companies without success.

•       What Google has done is to destroy a competing platform, Parler (AOC, Khana, and others supported this). 

•       This will make more difficult the ability to organize on the internet.  Corporations are outside democratic accountability.

•       Hedges points out that Greenwald has gone to Substack as has Matt Taibi. 

•       This is an effort of destruction of any outlet that permits independent voices of dissent.  They are laying the groundwork for rightwing censorship.  They will go after others.  It won’t be long before they are Turning guns on Substack and Patrion.

Greenwald    

•       Greenwald became concerned (about the media) when, during the Bush administration, the mainstream media presented torture as a “both sides” issue.  They wouldn’t call torture torture because the Bush administration said it wasn’t torture.  They took the position of “who are we to decide?”  We can’t call it torture because the Bush administration says it’s not true. We’ll just present both sides and let you decide.  This is not journalism.

Article about Greenwald, Counterpunch

•       Greenwald first came to prominence as an anti-Bush blogger

•       He published much of the Snowden reporting in “The Guardian.” 

•       He co-founded along with Jeremy Scahill and Laura Poitras, The Intercept.

•       His columns have become “insufferable.”

•       There is “almost no ideology besides reflexive contrarianism.”

•       Greenwald is “a kind of fanatic.”

•       The tendency toward contrarianism has led him to increasingly align with the far right. 

•       For example, Greenwald has made comparisons between Trump and Bernie.

•       Matt Taibbi has taken a “similar turn.”

•       He is an opponent of the national security state.

scarborough, both sidesism, fbi, georgia is not a beacon of hope

Joe Scarborough, both-sideser in chief and head MSNBC misogynist is at it again this morning joined by his usual kiss ass crew.  He got in a little trouble yesterday by repeatedly asking guests whether it was necessary to impeach Trump.  The dreadful Mika told him to stop and he responded like the petulant bully he is, by berating her and trying to embarrass her on national television.

This morning, he and Peter Baker are trying to figure out how “we” can work with the Republicans like James Langford, who have suddenly had an attack of conscience over trying to overthrow an election.

But, for Scarborough and Baker, that’s just a minor blip.  Sedition?  Just apologize and Scarborough will find a way to launder your reputation (if you are a Repubican). 

Baker’s contribution to this was to lament the fact that, in his words, both sides have decided to go back into their partisan corners.  Equal corners, right?  One side is providing the rationale for sedition and the other is trying to restore democracy, but they are both equally to blame. 

On to other matters.

On Ari Melber’s MSNBC show last night, Eugene Robinson (Mr. Mild Manners himself) said that the Republicans created this division and now they are buying body armor.

AOC was evidently so afraid when the attack was going on, she was fearful of going into a safe room with Republicans.  She thought they might lead the attackers to her.  It was not an unreasonable suspicion since one of the members of the House was texting out the location of Nancy Pelosi.

Lindsey Graham characterized the impeachment proceedings as “sheer hatred.”  I can’t wait to find out why Graham did a 180 turn to support Trump.  Maybe if Trump gets more and more frustrated, he will start to spill the dirt. 

Rep Madeleine Dean, who will be one of the impeachment managers said “Lindsay Graham knows better.”   “You too” she said referring to Graham, “are complicit…” 

Trump evidently brought Bannon back into the sedition circle.  Roger Stone was the one who came up with the “Stop the Steal” rallying cry. 

Tony Schwartz is saying that Trump is now moving “between rage and delusion.”  And that Trump has unleashed forces that we may well see become more powerful in the future.  

Peter Strzok, former FBI, expressed “frustration and anger” at the lack of preparedness at the Capitol.  If you look at other events, Strzok argued: “The government can secure the capitol when it wants to and that didn’t happen here.”  Strzok said that the tour groups that evidently went through the Capitol the day before the assault needed to be “looked into.”

Elizabeth Newmann, former Assistant Secretary for Threat Presentation and Security Policy at DHS, explained that the Terrorist Watch List is a separate list from the No Fly List and is broader, larger.  She says it includes “suspected white supremacists.”  But, she also said, this list functions more as an alert system than a surveillance system.  If, for example, someone got arrested, law enforcement could run the name and the person would show up as on this Terrorist Watch List.  But, there is no ongoing surveillance on these people.  So, they could all decide to go to Washington at the same time and go and there would be no automatic alert because of this list.

Last night, Rachael Maddow was commenting on the absurdity of having people on this list, but not knowing that they were all converging on the same problematic location.  The only way law enforcement could know this is if these people were under constant surveillance and I’m not sure that’s what we want.

A number of people are already pointing out on Twitter and in articles that this siege of the Capitol may well end up working to the disadvantage of legitimate protest.  As always, it’s easy to argue for more surveillance of individuals when they are opposed to you politically.  But, these same surveillance measures can be turned quickly against legitimate protest.

I heard no discussion yesterday of the way in which a person might be put on this Terrorist Watch List.  Once on this list, are you ever taken off?  What surveillance measures can the government take after you are put on this list? These are questions we need to answer.

Newman, after explaining the list, went on to say that there was “no excuse for the lack of preparation” at the capitol.  She pointed out that that the Executive Branch, while reluctant to tell another branch of government what to do, has a “duty to warn” of dangerous situations.  They, for example, should have issued a “Joint Intelligence Bulletin.”  They did not.  “They knew that violence was planned” Newman continued.  “You always assume the worst, prepare for the worst…”

Petef Strzok expressed disappointment that we had not heard from Director Wray.  He wondered whether the FBI attempted to warn other agencies but was prevented from doing so.  Strzok didn’t say by whom. 

Anna Palmer noted that since the COVID outbreak, the Capitol had been like a “ghosttown.”  She noted the extensive security measures for even going into the Capitol as a reporter.  “It’s been months since people were even around” she noted.  These tours were highly unusual. 

Biden has named Jamaal Bowman head of the DNC.  It has not escaped notice that Bowman is against Medicare For All. 

And, lastly, in Georgia…

I had an interesting exchange with a friend on Facebook.  He commented that when the FBI asked all these low-level attackers who are being arrested if they had any coordination or contact with Congressmen or Trump, they would flip and implicate them.

I responded: True, if the FBI agents ask them.

Now, as usual, he took exception to this.  Most people, especially those who have worked around law enforcement accept a law enforcement ethos.  They resist any aspersions on the integrity of the force, even confronted with daily evidence to the contrary.

He responded in a curious way.  First he said that I shouldn’t paint all agents with a “broad brush.”  Seemed to me that he was painting them with a broad brush, just assuming that the FBI would be trying to turn offenders on higher ups.  Why this assumption is made, I don’t know. 

We have just witnessed years of the most curious behavior on the part of the FBI and the Justice Department in recent memory.  Why did James Comey make public the absurd reopening of the investigation of Hillary Clinton right before the 2016 election?  Why did he within the past few days argue publicly that Biden should pardon Trump?  What was going on in the New York City office of the FBI in 2016 that almost lead to a work stoppage?  These are just a few threads that need to be followed up here.  In addition, why was the Justice Department so easily compromised by Jeff Sessions and then Bill Barr?  Why was the Mueller investigation so limited as to make it meaningless?

I’m sorry, but I just don’t think we can assume that all those FBI agents out there are crusaders for justice especially when it comes to investigating people at the top of the food chain.  (See Jesse Eisinger’s “The Chickenshit Club.)

Then, my friend said that the last time he talked to me I was (overly) concerned “dismayed” with voter suppression in Georgia, and Georgia had become the beacon of election security.  Georgia, he said had become the “honest election state that is saving democracy. What truly happened?”

Now, I have no idea what this last paragraph has to do with FBI agents working overtime to get dirt on powerful Congressmen, but there you are.

I find the statement amazing.  I fully realize that the media, prone as they are to simplistic narratives, is trying to make heroes out of Raffensperger, Sterling and Kemp, but anybody who reads should know that Georgia is far from a beacon of hope.

Brian Kemp’s government spent a fortune on a fancy new voting machine system.  And they conducted a propaganda operation by replacing all the “I voted” material with “I secured my Vote.”  It was all a propaganda operation.  I did poll worker training in Georgia before the general and I left at lunch and didn’t go back.  It was obvious to me then that the new system was unwieldy and full of holes.  The measures taken to “secure the vote” were geared toward security threats in the 19th century.  Nobody could answer questions about hacking into the system. 

Even though the media has touted “paper ballots” as an indication of transparency, in Georgia, they are not really “paper ballots.”

The ballots are marked by a machine.  Then, the voter gets a sheet of paper which has his choices printed on it. The voter is supposed to check these choices to make sure they are right.  But, the scanners that count the votes do not even register the words printed on the ballot.  They count a bar code at the bottom of the ballot.  The voter cannot read the bar code.  The poll workers cannot read the bar code.  I don’t think anybody outside of the Voting Machine company can read the bar codes.  It’s protected by law.  What kind of state of affairs is that?

Before the general election, Brian Kemp’s government made a decision that any recount in Georgia would be done by simply feeding the same ballots (with the same bar codes) through the scanners again.

In short, Georgia spent a fortune on a voting system that is impenetrable.  They regularly send out “experts” who claim that the system cannot be hacked.  But, Jennifer Cohn, Jonathan Simon and the Coalition for Good Governance have repeatedly offered evidence that at best, we don’t know this.

In addition, Kemp is the king of voter suppression.  That’s how he won a race against Stacey Abrams for governor.  Raffensperger and Sterling were in the voter suppression game up to their eye balls.  Kemp, Raffensperger and Sterling are like the guys who are willing to drive the getaway car, but not willing to go into the liquor store with the gun.

Oh,

Just in case you hadn’t heard…Kyle Rittenhouse is out on bail and sitting in a bar drinking and yucking it up with the Proud Boys. Reality Winner has COVID and in still in jail.  I know she’s not receiving her mail because I have a box of returned letters.

republicans might not like trump but they “don’t regret the supreme court.”

Can I just say that Sam Nunberg is an imbecile.  He was in an important position in the Trump as a “campaign advisor” because he is an imbecile and now CNN is interviewing him as if he is this expert on anything. 

Nunberg at one time faced prosecution because of his role in the Trump campaign and he is saying about Trump:  “He is not a perfect man.”  Nunberg, says that he has no regrets about working to get Trump elected.  This fruitful line of discussion was cut off by the CNN anchor.  But, Nunberg continued: “I don’t regret the Supreme Court.  I don’t regret …Israel.”  “He (Trump) did a service to the forgotten men and women…”  “I am happy he beat Hillary Clinton…”

Tony Schwartz, who was also on the CNN panel broke in to confront Nunberg.  Schwartz said it was “sad to hear somebody say I don’t take any responsibility.”  “Come one Sam.”  “It’s time to say the truth about this man.”

But, Nunberg, growing visibly angry, just continued to defend Trump.

While CNN cut this discussion off, it is an important one.  What it demonstrates is that these people around Trump (even those who have been left out to dry in terms of prosecution by the Trump administration) have learned nothing.  To the extent that Nunberg is willing to criticize Trump and those around him it is because they didn’t step in to legally protect Nunberg. 

On to another topic raised by the CNN coverage this morning.  Tony Schwartz said that this might be his last public statement about Trump because everything that can be said has been said.

I agree with Schwartz.  I am completely disgusted with this continued cheap psychoanalysis of Trump that takes up hours and hours on corporate news.  I don’t care what Trump thinks.  I don’t care what is “inside Trump’s head” as CNN purported to cover this morning.  I care about what Trump does and what he represents and what the complicit group of people around him are fomenting.  This is a movement and make no mistake, Mitch McConnell is as much a part of it as is Donald Trump.  Getting rid of Trump (if we even can) is not going to solve the problem.

This is one of the reasons why people in my intellectual territory of the Democratic Party shudder every time Biden or his cohorts starts to talk about “healing” or “unity” or (to repeat Obama’s line) “moving on.”

McConnell may have decided that he has gotten as much out of Trump as he can, and is now ready to kick him to the curb.  But, moving on means McConnell and the Koch’s will find somebody else, smarter, cleaner, more devious, and more palatable to carry on the fight to establish an authoritarian one-party Christian nationalist state.  That’s where they have been going for decades and where they will continue going, with Trump at the head or not.

Mitch McConnell (and McConnell’s wife), Bill Barr and others are making self-serving statements, so that they can live to fight another day.  And, the corporate media is already complicit in laundering the reputations of prominent Republicans.  Joe Scarborough is a prime example of someone who will happily criticize Trump (who threatened to out his adulterous affair, and who called Scarborough a murderer) and then turn around and laud Republicans who are complicit in advancing Republican goals while making superficial criticisms of Trump.

“I don’t regret the Supreme Court” should be tattooed on the foreheads of Mitch McConnell, Steve Schmidt, Joe Scarborough, Elise Jordan, Nicolle Wallace, Mitt Romney, Pat Toomey, Ben Sasse, John Bolton, George Conway, Bill Kristol, Michael Steele, Jeff Flake, Justic Amash, David Jolly?, John Kasich, Tom Cotton, Marco Rubio, Susan Collins, Richard Burr, James Lankford and many others.

Folks, these people are not our friends.  They cannot be our allies.  They have worked for decades to bring this situation about.  They established the groundwork for this situation.  They cannot plead ignorance and innocence now.

The Democratic elite and impeachment: When I say I’m handling it, I’m handling it.

A lot of people were extremely upset with the Democratic leadership for loudly proclaiming on the one hand, that Trump presented a grave danger to the country and on the other, calmly informing us that they were going to wait over the weekend to start impeachment proceedings.

I was one of those people.  This morning, turned on my computer to find that someone named Samantha Corbin was lecturing me about House rules.  According to her, Democrats could not reconvene until Monday without Unanimous Consent and Kevin McCarthy was holding this up.  So, I could just shut my uninformed mouth and stop carping.

Others who were disgusted with the Democrats were also lectured on Twitter their lack of understanding of House rules and procedures and chided for childish impatience.

This is so characteristic of the Democratic elite I just don’t know where to begin.

First of all, on the rules question.  Corbin and evidently Pelosi’s daughter @sfpelosi (whose tweets I am prevented from seeing because she strictly limits access) presented this rule about reconvening as iron clad.  The House could not reconvene until Monday, period.  No way, no how without the unanimous consent of the House.

But, as other people in the Twitter discussion pointed out, it was simply impossible to believe that there was not a way around this rule.  What happens, for example, if the House needs to meet on a Sunday because of a national emergency (which this is)?  Are they sincerely telling us that under no circumstance can the House meet before Monday without unanimous consent?

And @MattGlassman312 contested Corbin and Peliso’s read of the rule.  He wrote that was required was “consultation” with the minority leader, not consent, and definitely not unanimous consent.

So, there is a question of whether what Pelosi et. al. are asserting about the rule is even correct.  And, even if it is correct, aren’t there ways around the rule?  If Nancy Pelosi is the strategic genius her supporters (and her daughter) maintain she is, why hasn’t she figured out how to get around this rule?  I would be willing to take a bet that if this rule was constraining Mitch McConnell he would have figured out a way around the rule or would simply violate the rule and worry about the consequences later.

And, as another person in the discussion pointed out, even with all this self-righteous lecturing about the rule, we don’t know whether Pelosi formally requested a weekend session and McCarthy objected or whether the Democratic elite were simply assuming that McCarthy would object and not bothering to even ask.  One of the people in the discussion points out that a “statement would be helpful.” Ya think?

Pelosi et. al. are whining on Twitter about being misunderstood, receiving unfair criticism from ignorant people, but we wouldn’t even be in this position if the elite in the Democratic Party felt it in any way incumbent on them to explain to the American people what was going on. 

For at least yesterday and today, Pelosi’s phone couldn’t be reached. The mailbox is full and nobody is answering.  Now, if Nancy Pelosi sincerely wanted to know what the unwashed masses thought, she would arrange for her phones to be working and messages to be taken.  But, the truth is that she doesn’t care.

If indeed the Democrats absolutely cannot convene until Monday, they should be all over the news explaining exactly why and who is holding them up.  They aren’t. This is the very first time I have ever heard that the rules prevent them from convening and that McCarthy is holding them up.

Why, oh why, can’t the Democrats seem to understand that every time the Republicans obstruct them, pointing this out gains them political points?  What’s so hard about that?  Why can’t the Democrats bring themselves to tell the truth about their “colleagues?”

There is political advantage to be gained by first of all explaining what they are doing to the American people and second of all scoring points off the Republicans’ obstruction.  They just won’t do it.  You tell me why.

Part of the attitude seems to come from an unbelievable hubris that characterizes the Democratic elite and the absolute belief that a class of professionals who make an enormous amount of money for consulting and advising, know what’s best.  They aren’t out there explaining to the rest of what they are doing because they don’t think they have to.  They regard us as a necessary evil.   It reminds me of that line in “The Postman Always Rings Twice” where the lawyer (Hume Croyn) says with sinister finality: “When I say I’m handling it, I’m handling it.”  The Democratic elite doesn’t feel a need to explain.  They don’t feel a need to answer their phones in a crisis.  And, they get damn offended if anybody questions them.

Nancy Pelosi and her minions have managed to create this narrative that Pelosi is this genius strategist and that the rest of us just aren’t smart enough to understand the three-dimensional chess game she is playing.  I have heard this mouthed by Mika Brzezinski and Jennifer Rubin, to name but two.  The “she’s a genius” combined with a big chunk of “you’re just criticizing her because she’s a woman” intimidates a lot of people.

As another person in the twitter discussion (@RhiFionn) pointed out: “If you want understanding, explain what’s going on…”  

essential podcasts: majority report interview with jared yates sexton

This is by far the best podcast out there. I know the corporate media is seductive, but your time would be better spent giving this a listen. Sam Seder puts together some of the most interesting and pertinent interviews available.

Sam Seder

Sam Seder interviews Jared Yates Sexton

https://majorityreportradio.com/2020/12/08/12-8-american-rule-how-a-nation-conquered-the-world-but-failed-its-people-w-jared-yates-sexton

From the Majority Report Website:

“Sam hosts writer and political analyst Jared Yates Sexton to discuss his new book, American Rule: How a Nation Conquered the World But Failed Its People, and why the foundational myths of American Exceptionalism have such a hold on the populace.

Sam and Jared explore the stories Americans told themselves throughout the country’s history, from how the process behind writing the Constitution to how the “Mound Builders” stories helped justify indigenous Americans’ slaughter. The two consider how these stories have shaped the populace’s thinking and why it’s essential to reject politics as a spectacle. 

Follow on @cjjohns1951