Skip to content

Law, Power, and Justice

Join me in trying to make sense of a complicated world.

  • Blog
  • ESSENTIAL READING:
  • Law, Power and Justice: Dr. Christina Johns
  • Look Who’s Talking
  • About
  • Contact

Recent Posts

  • CALL IT EVIL
  • STAPLE GUNS AND MELANIA
  • (no title)
  • life and news notes.
  • NETANYAHU KNEw
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • How Democracies Die

    June 1, 2019

    how democracies die

    Authoritarians rise to power in part because establishment politicians overlook the warning signs and hand power over to them.  Mussolini was invited to take power.  A day after Hitler became chancellor, a prominent conservative who had helped him, said: “I have just committed the greatest stupidity of my life.  I have allied myself with the greatest demagogue in world history.”  What Levitsky and Ziblatt (in their book “How Democracies Die”) describe as “a lethal mix of ambition fear, and miscalculation” conspire to lead the establishment in country after country to the same fateful mistake: “willingly handing over the keys of power to an autocrat-in-the-making.”

    “The abdication of political responsibility by existing leaders often marks a nation’s first step toward authoritarianism.”

     

    How Democracies Die.

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • Best Quotes of the Night: Sam Seder and Elie Mystal

    May 30, 2019

    elie

    Where, Elie Mystal asks are the heros?  “I mean Robert Mueller.”  We needed “batman” and what we got was a “perfectly nice and well-meaning functionary who thinks his job is to signal with the light and then wait quietly for help to arrive.”

    sam seder

    “There’s every reason to believe that the Republicans have absolutely no problem” with what is going on in the Trump administration.  “There has been very little evidence that the Republicans are terribly concerned about democracy…”  When other countries look at us what they see is that “…there’s something fundamentally unstable about that country.”

    Comments on Chris Hayes, MSNBC, 5/30/19

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • “If he were an honorable person…” David Frum on William Barr

    May 30, 2019

    david frum.jpg

    “If he were an honorable and forthright person, he wouldn’t have gotten the job in the first place.”  David Frum talking about Barr on Ari Melber, MSNBC.

     

     

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • Mueller Joined “The Chickenshit Club.”

    May 29, 2019

    mueller

    In 2002, James Comey was appointed U.S. Attorney for the District of Manhattan.  Early in his tenure he spoke to a gathering of his prosecutors.  “Who here,” he asked from the podium “has never had an acquittal…?”  Prosecutors proudly raised their hands.  Comey surveyed the room.  “My friends and I have a name for you,” he said.  “You are members of what we like to call the Chickenshit Club.”

    Comey went on to make the point to his prosecutors that they weren’t there to advance their careers or rack up large settlements that looked good in the press.  They were there to do justice.  They were there, Comey continued, to right the biggest injustices, not go after the easiest targets.  But, as Jesse Eisinger argues in his book “The Chickenshit Club,” that’s exactly what prosecutors in the Justice Department did.  And, I would argue, continue to do.

    With that shift in prosecutorial practice (aided by increasingly lenient interpretations of the law from the bench who were pressured by politicians representing big money interests), the system became almost incapable of holding powerful white collar and corporate criminals accountable.  I would add to that, holding powerful political criminals to account.

    I invite everyone to look at the Mueller Report and the mumbly-mouthed statement of Robert Mueller today in that light.  As Eisinger points out, prosecutors who were settling cases instead of prosecuting wrongdoers, “lost potent investigative tools and softened their practices, changes that have made it harder to gather evidence and conduct even the most basic investigations.”

    The Mueller Report is almost a text book case of what Eisinger is writing about.  Pursuing the indictment of criminals  has come to be seen as too difficult.  Again and again, Mueller says somebody lied, somebody withheld evidence, somebody destroyed evidence and so investigators couldn’t make the case.  I would hazard a guess that in every investigation people lie, destroy evidence and withhold evidence.  The job of the prosecutor is to overcome those obstructive tactics.  Prosecution should be the “nasty trench warfare” Eisinger describes, not a game of cards at the gentleman’s club.  But, Mueller played the gentleman’s game.  He is now too embarrassed to testify and answer questions about it.  He is hiding behind the argument that testifying would be too “political.”  But, what Mueller has done is one of the most significant political moves in this entire story.  He has helped Trump, et. al. absolve themselves of criminal responsibility and deny the collusive behavior they are so obviously guilty of.

    It is completely obvious that Mueller, instead of arresting, jailing, pressuring wrongdoers, threw up his hands and whined that people obstructed the investigation.    Mueller was afraid of the “slog; nasty trench warfare” that carried the “risk of humiliation” if he lost.

    Eisinger writes: “Today the justice system is broken.  Over the decade after Jim Comey’s speech, his words failed.  The Justice Department succumbed.  The department avoided the biggest cases.  It became fearful of losing and lost sight of its fundamental mission to make this country a just place.  James Comey would have no way of knowing it at the time, but his sermon to the Southern District prosecutors could have easily been a eulogy for the courage he hoped to muster.  The Chickenshit Club ranks in the years ahead would only grow.”

    Robert Mueller is now clearly part of the Chickenshit Club.

    But, after the corporate media spent a year weaving the fiction that Robert Mueller was a savior, knew everything, saw everything, would right every wrong, they will not permit this reality to be spoken.  They cannot admit to themselves that Robert Mueller is part of the problem he was investigating.  First of all, he so narrowly defined his mission that he couldn’t possibly have found wrongdoing. He timidly accepted an OLC directive that he need not have paid attention to.  He failed to make relevant parties to the investigation testify.  He ignored crucial areas of investigation like Trump’s finances.  His office recommended sentences for acts bordering on treason that were lighter than those for parking violations.

    Mueller’s report, therefore, has become a crucial part of the consolidation of power of Trump and his cronies who are busily establishing a kleptocratic state.  The corporate media cheerfully has gone along with it.  Pundits still tie themselves in rhetorical knots trying to laud Robert Mueller while denying the reality that he protected himself and threw the country under the bus.

     

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • When You Vote for a Republican…”vehicles for greed.”

    May 28, 2019

    chao

    When you vote for a Republican, any Republican, this is what you’re voting for.   Trump and his entire administration are raking in the money made off public service.  This is not a case of a few grifters, this is plan.

    Pierce, Charles P.  (5/28/19)  “The swamp isn’t drained…” Esquire.

    For a short summary of just the past few days, read Charlie Pierce’s article in Esquire.  And, this is just what we know about.

    • “Members of the administration have turned their offices into vehicles of greed.”
    • Kushner Cos. Has received $800 million in federal backed debt to buy apartments.
    • The man overseeing the Federal Housing Finance Agency which regulates Fannie and Freddie, was previously CEO of a bank founded by Treasury Secretary Mnuchin.
    • Elaine Chao still owns stock in a company she promised to divest herself from over a year ago. She’s made an estimated $40,000 off the stock since she promised she would ditch them.  In case you don’ remember, Chao is the wife of Mitch McConnell.

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • Jeremy Skahill on the Arrest of Julian Assange and the First Amendment

    May 28, 2019

    assange

    This is an enlightening discussion on Democracy Now which includes a video made by Jeremy Skahill (author of the book about Eric Prince and Blackwater, and journalist on the Intercept) about the threat to journalism of the arrest of Julian Assange.

    Skahill video

    https://www.democracynow.org/2019/5/24/jeremy_scahill_new_indictment_of_assange

     

     

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • Who’s Profiting on the War in Yemen

    May 25, 2019

    http://inthesetimes.com/features/us-saudi-arabia-yemen-war-arms-sales.html

    yeman

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • Friday Afternoon: The Road To Authoritarianism

    May 24, 2019

    orwell.jpg

     

    The Trump administration is continuing its road to authoritarianism by creating and distributing a doctored video of a political opponent (Nancy Pelosi). Republicans have failed to condemn this action.  Even though these images were known to be manipulated to make Pelosi look as if she was slurring words or drunk, they become part of people’s memories.  This sort of distortion is a common tactic of authoritarian regimes.  See “George Orwell’s 1989” https://slate.com/technology/2010/05/tampering-with-photographs-and-political-memories.html

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • Julian Assange Indictment

    May 23, 2019

    assange

    When Julian Assange was originally indicted, the government carefully avoided bringing charges that directly implicated press freedom.  In this new set of charges, however, Assange is indicted under the Espionage Act and actions regularly engaged in by most media organizations are implicated.  Jameel Jaffer of the Knight First Amendment Institute, argued that this set of indictments is what many press freedom organizations have been worrying about since the original indictment.  It is, he says, the first time in a hundred years, the Espionage act has been used against a publisher for publishing information.  We are, he says, “crossing a new and very dangerous frontier.”

    Adam Serwer of the Atlantic Magazine points out that Assange is the perfect person for Trump to use to set a precedent for prosecuting the people he really wants to prosecute, i.e., the people investigating him.  This case is intended to expand Trump’s powers so he can “go after the very journalists who have been exposing his corruption for the past three years.”  “He has picked Assange” because liberals hate him so much.

    Additionally, Serwer points out that this prosecution will not stop leaking.  It will, however, mean that the government will leak information selectively to influence opinion.  The government can manipulate the public by using classified information with no power of the press to contradict the information.

    Jaffer notes that we are not sure that Assange will be extradited, but even if he isn’t, the indictment alone has a chilling effect.  “It’s about control of information.”  “The indictment itself is going to send a very chilling message.”

    Jaffer and Serwer made their comments on “All In” with Chris Hayes, MSNBC 5/23/19.

     

     

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • Julian Assange Indictment

    May 23, 2019

    assange

    https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1153486/download

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • Because of United States Pressure: Cuba Rations Essential Supplies

    May 23, 2019

     

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • If You Haven’t Discovered Lawrence Wilkerson, You Are Missing Out

    May 21, 2019

    lawrence wilkerson

    The media coverage of the situation in Venezuela has been horrible.  Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff to  Colin Powel, can always be counted on for good sense and plain speaking.

    The Tragedy of Venezuela is the Tragedy of the US

    Also, see Wilkerson’s article in the New York Times today.

     

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • How Did We Get Into This Mess?

    May 20, 2019

    Monbiot, George (2016)  How Did We Get Into This Mess? London and New York: Verso.

    how we got into this mess

    “This apparatus of justification, or infrastructure of persuasion, and the justifying narratives it generates allow the rich to seize much of our common wealth, to trample the rights of workers and to treat the planet as their dustbin. Ideas, not armies or even banks, run the world.  Ideas determine whether human creativity works for society or against it.” (1)

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • Felix Sater

    May 19, 2019

    felix saterFelix Sater to Michael Cohen (11/3/15)  “Buddy our boy can become President of the USA and we can engineer it.  I will get all of Putin’s team to buy in on this, I will manage this process.”  Mueller Report, Vol I, Page 71.

    What the Mueller Report Didn’t Say About Felix Sater and the Trump Tower in Moscow

     

     

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
  • The Propaganda of the Pundit Class

    May 17, 2019

    morning joe in pajamas

    Morning Joe (Biden) continues, every weekday morning, to infuriate me.  The Morning Joe show is doing in 2019 exactly what it did in 2015 and 2016, i.e., inserting itself into the election process by giving outlandish amounts of coverage to one candidate.  In 2015, 2016, it was Donald Trump.  Almost every Morning Joe started off with clips of Donald Trump speaking.  Then, the program allowed him to phone in daily comments.  Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski were whoring around at Mar-A-Lago even after the election.  They broke with Trump only after he threatened to out their adulterous affair.  Now, though, you would think that Joe Scarborough had fought against Trump from the date of his (Scarborough’s) birth.  Scarborough and Brzezinski are hypocrites and liars, both of them.

    Now, they are on the “elect Biden” train, relentlessly repeating that Biden is the “frontrunner” and citing endless polls most of which are biased towards older respondents and people with land lines.  They are making daily assertions that all the money from donors is going to Biden, that Bernie is “in trouble,”  that people are supporting Biden because they want to “beat Donald Trump.”  That people don’t want to vote for Bernie Sanders because they don’t want to change the entire economic system at a time when the economy is doing so well.

    Let’s take that last assertion first.  The economy may be doing well for the Scarborough’s and the Brzezinski’s of the world and the rest of the upper, upper class, but it’s not doing well for regular people.  And, those regular people are about to lose 1) their health care, 2) their protection from insurance companies and predatory rules about pre-existing conditions, and 3) their ability to keep their children on health insurance until 25.  Second, Bernie Sanders is not going to change the entire economic system.  He is going to make sure, however, that this economic system functions with more justice.  It is a stupid lie and irresponsible distortion to argue that Bernie Sanders advocates anything other than a social democratic system that protects ordinary people from the predatory behavior of the upper class and corporations.

    Scarborough and Brzezinski, however, attempt to create the impression that Biden is the only candidate that can beat Trump.  People sometimes argue with me that what people like Scarborough and Brzezinski say is irrelevant.  I understand their point to a certain extent.  But, I hear their propaganda parroted back to me over Lunch with Southern Ladies.  The received wisdom of the pundit class, repeated relentlessly becomes the cheap analysis of ordinary people who don’t care enough about politics to study and read.  These cheap clichés become the basis of their voting.

     

    Share this:

    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • More
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    Like Loading…
«Previous Page
1 … 209 210 211 212 213 … 223
Next Page»

Law, Power, and Justice

Blog at WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    Law, Power, and Justice
    Join 62 other subscribers

    Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

  • Law, Power, and Justice
    View site in Reader
    Manage subscriptionsSign upLog in
    Report this content
    Collapse this bar
%d